Prediction of Marek Gengel [245th] vs Viktor Jovic [886th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W L L L
Form
W W W L L L L W W WH2H: Gengel 0 - 0 Jovic
| Gengel | Stats | Jovic |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (12-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (3-2) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 245 | Ranking | 886 |
| 229 | Highest Rank | 729 |
| 29 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 17 | Titles | 1 |
| 59% (374-261) | Career Total W/L | 54% (96-81) |
| $3,280 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marek Gengel vs Viktor Jovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gengel 0 - 0 Jovic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gengel has won 42.05% of points on their second serve, while Jovic has won 32.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gengel, in recent form, has won 45.13% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jovic has won 52.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.07% and 29.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gengel has saved 57.08% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jovic has saved 54.05% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gengel has won 70.59% of matches played (W/L 72/ 30), with Jovic winning 61.29% (W/L 19/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gengel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 270/ 134), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Jovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 58/ 45), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 38/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Gengel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.05% of matches (W/L 64/ 18), where as Jovic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.29% of matches (W/L 19/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gengel has played against opponents with an average rank of 186.91 while Jovic has played against players with an average rank of 46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gengel has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jovic has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gengel has converted 32.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jovic has converted 52.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Marek Gengel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Oscar Moraing
Player
Marek Gengel
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Konstantin Zhzhenov
Player
Marek Gengel
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Marek Gengel
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
12
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
4
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
10 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Nico Hipfl
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Hugo Ouzilou
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oskari Paldanius
Player
Marek Gengel
63%
(
65 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Michele Ribecai
55%
(
12 of
22)
1st Serve %
52%
(
14 of
27)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
67%
(
8 of
12)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
41%
(
9 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
28
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Hugo Ouzilou
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Marek Gengel
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(1) 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Viktor Jovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Viktor Jovic
Player
Pijus Vaitiekunas
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
60
Total Points Won
55
|
3-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Viktor Jovic
Player
Daniel Blazka
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Viktor Jovic
51%
(
45 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
6
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
5
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Saveliy Ivanov
Player
Viktor Jovic
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
5
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Viktor Jovic
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Viktor Jovic
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
11
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktor Jovic
Player
Abel Forger
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Jovic
Player
Lucio Carnevalle
43%
(
20 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Jovic
Player
Izan Almazan Valiente
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
1
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
1-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Gengel vs Jovic?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Gengel Vs Jovic is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (374/261) | Win/Loss | 54% (96/81) |
| 57% (831/621) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (218/192) |
| 53% (7224/6424) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1948/1881) |
| 0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 2812 | Aces Total | 343 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1273 | Total Double Faults | 376 |
| 1:19:20 | Average Match Time | 1:20:22 |
| 235.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 174.2 |
| 63% (23639/37317) | 1st Serve % | 64% (5853/9164) |
| 70% (16638/23639) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (3818/5853) |
| 50% (6825/13677) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1581/3311) |
| 43% (1639/3852) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (391/877) |
| 40% (15313/38301) | Return Points Win % | 40% (3558/8865) |
| 59% (370/626) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (95/174) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 53% (96/180) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (13/32) |
| 54% (102/188) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (31/55) |
| 88% (363/318) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (90/74) |
| 12% (363/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (90/16) |
| 20% (271/55) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (87/23) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Marek Gengel
View full predicted draw for Gengel
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Viktor Jovic
View full predicted draw for Jovic
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
